IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v69y1955i2p161-190..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scholastic Economics: Survival and Lasting Influence from the Sixteenth Century to Adam Smith

Author

Listed:
  • Raymond de Roover

Abstract

I. Introduction: the medieval contribution, 161. — II. The school of Salamanca, 167. — III. The demise of scholastic economics, 171. — IV. Scholasticism and mercantilism: a contrast, 177. — V. Conclusions, 185.

Suggested Citation

  • Raymond de Roover, 1955. "Scholastic Economics: Survival and Lasting Influence from the Sixteenth Century to Adam Smith," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 69(2), pages 161-190.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:69:y:1955:i:2:p:161-190.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1882146
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sascha O. Becker & Luigi Pascali, 2019. "Religion, Division of Labor, and Conflict: Anti-semitism in Germany over 600 Years," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(5), pages 1764-1804, May.
    2. Gregg Samuel, 2003. "End of a Myth: Max Weber, Capitalism, and the Medieval Order," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Bertram Schefold, 2011. "Cameralism as an Intermediary between Mediterranean Scholastic Economic Thought and Classical Economics," Chapters, in: Heinz D. Kurz & Tamotsu Nishizawa & Keith Tribe (ed.), The Dissemination of Economic Ideas, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Vergés Josep C., 2000. "The Political Economy of the Just Price: What the School of Salamanca Has To Say in the Age of Corruption," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 1-33, June.
    5. Alberto Castrillón, 2003. "Probabilismo: ética y economía," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 5(9), pages 55-77, July-Dece.
    6. Clara Jace, 2019. "An economic theory of economic analysis: the case of the School of Salamanca," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 375-397, December.
    7. Trifilio Sylvain, 2018. "The Economic Theory of the Scholastics as a Contractual Analysis," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 24(1), pages 1-6, June.
    8. Nadia Matringe, 2016. "Ratio Pecuniam Parit Accounting and the making of financial markets in the Early Modern Age," Working Papers hal-01358129, HAL.
    9. Sabiou M. Inoua & Vernon L. Smith, 2020. "Adam Smith’s Theory of Value: A Reappraisal of Classical Price Discovery," Working Papers 20-10, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    10. Jérôme Blanc & Ludovic Desmedt, 2014. "In search of a ‘crude fancy of childhood’: deconstructing mercantilism," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 38(3), pages 585-604.
    11. José Luis Cendejas Bueno, 2021. "Justice and just price in Francisco de Vitoria's Commentary on Summa Theologica II-II q77," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 14(1-2), pages 1-32, November.
    12. André Alves & José Moreira, 2013. "Virtue and Commerce in Domingo de Soto’s Thought: Commercial Practices, Character, and the Common Good," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 113(4), pages 627-638, April.
    13. Philipp Robinson Rössner, 2019. "Martin Luther and the making of the modern economic mind," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 66(3), pages 233-248, September.
    14. Domènec Melé, 2016. "Re-thinking Capitalism: What We can Learn from Scholasticism?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 293-304, January.
    15. Neri Salvadori & Rodolfo Signorino, 2014. "Adam Smith on Monopoly Theory. Making good a lacuna," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 61(2), pages 178-195, May.
    16. Becker, Sascha O. & Pascali, Luigi, 2016. "Religion, Division of Labor and Conflict: Anti-Semitism in German Regions over 600 Years," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 288, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    17. Chris Fleming & David Rigamer & Walter Block, 2012. "The Jesuits: The Jesuits: From Markets To Marxism; From Property Protection To Social Progressivism," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 7(2), pages 7-22, June.
    18. Ivan Verbanov, 2003. "Forerunner of the Theories of the Free Market Economy," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 72-88.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:69:y:1955:i:2:p:161-190.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.