IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v55y2025i1p3-29..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Emergence of the Second Amendment Sanctuary Movement: Partisan Federalism, Not White Protectionism

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Filindra
  • Cassidy Reller
  • Craig Burnett

Abstract

One-third of all US counties have enacted Second Amendment Sanctuary (2AS) ordinances, preventing the enforcement of state and federal gun control laws. We test two theories to explain 2AS enactment. First, 2AS may be a manifestation of partisan federalism. This perspective predicts that the nationalization of policy issues has led partisan groups to support “sanctuary” policies in friendly jurisdictions to frustrate the opposition. Second, given the close link between gun policy preferences and racial identities, 2AS enactment may be related to racial dynamics and especially the declining political power of White Americans. Thus, we should expect that 2AS adoptions will occur in majority White counties with declining White populations. We leverage a unique dataset of county-level 2AS enactments to test these hypotheses. We find strong evidence for the partisan federalism hypothesis. In contrast, we find weak and inconsistent evidence for the racial threat hypothesis.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Filindra & Cassidy Reller & Craig Burnett, 2025. "The Emergence of the Second Amendment Sanctuary Movement: Partisan Federalism, Not White Protectionism," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 55(1), pages 3-29.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:55:y:2025:i:1:p:3-29.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjae025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:55:y:2025:i:1:p:3-29.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.