IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v52y2022i3p476-496..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Intra-State Tensions in Government Responses to COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Stanley Federman
  • Cali Curley

Abstract

Research and attention to federalism has vastly increased due to the COVID-19 pandemic. While political polarization has largely been used as a scapegoat to explain the U.S. policy response to the pandemic, federalism has also been credited and blamed for the policy response and has played an important role in providing avenues for conflict. This article explores intra-state conflict stemming from COVID-19. We utilize ten exploratory cases to identify three distinct but interrelated patterns of conflict that emerged within U.S. states, focusing on tensions between the executive and legislative branches, between bureaucratic officials and the legislature, and between state and local governments. We then examine a series of questions regarding the implication of these conflicts, focusing on the issuance of executive orders, the responses undertaken by officials who disagreed with and sought to push back against these orders, and the ways that inter-branch and inter-governmental disagreements about these orders were resolved.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Stanley Federman & Cali Curley, 2022. "Exploring Intra-State Tensions in Government Responses to COVID-19," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 52(3), pages 476-496.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:52:y:2022:i:3:p:476-496.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjac015
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abrams, Jesse & Wollstein, Katherine & Davis, Emily Jane, 2018. "State lines, fire lines, and lines of authority: Rangeland fire management and bottom-up cooperative federalism," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 252-259.
    2. Ethan M. Bernick & E. Lee Bernick, 2008. "Executive‐Legislative Relations: Where You Sit Really Does Matter," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 89(4), pages 969-986, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steen-Adams, Michelle M. & Charnley, Susan & Adams, Mark D.O., 2023. "Cross-boundary cooperation in wildfire management during the custodial management period of the US Forest Service: A case study of the eastern Cascades of Oregon, USA, 1905–1945," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    2. Emmanuel Makoji Egwu, 2020. "Managing Legislature-Executive Relationship and Conflict in the Nigerian Presidential Democracy," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(7), pages 339-349, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:52:y:2022:i:3:p:476-496.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.