IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v48y2018i4p607-635..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining Policy Convergence and Polity Divergence in Federal Systems: German and Swiss Higher Education Revisited

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Dobbins
  • Dennis Niemann
  • Kerstin Martens

Abstract

This article explores higher education reforms in the federally organized education systems of Germany and Switzerland. We argue that the increasing internationalization of education—spearheaded by the Bologna Process—has brought about changes not only in higher education policy, but also led to significant reconfigurations of the higher education polity. These processes present an empirical puzzle: while higher education policies in both systems have broadly moved in the same direction, they have significantly diverged regarding the higher education polity. While Germany has decentralized its higher education system, Switzerland has embraced more centralized structures. Drawing on historical institutionalism, we explain why Germany and Switzerland reacted to essentially identical external challenges with diametrically opposite polity reforms. We contend that this “polity divergence”—despite “policy convergence”—was channeled by the preexisting institutional configurations of educational federalism which steered partisan conflicts along specific paths.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Dobbins & Dennis Niemann & Kerstin Martens, 2018. "Explaining Policy Convergence and Polity Divergence in Federal Systems: German and Swiss Higher Education Revisited," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 48(4), pages 607-635.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:48:y:2018:i:4:p:607-635.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjy005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:48:y:2018:i:4:p:607-635.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.