IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v46y2016i3p441-462..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Federalism and the Roberts Court

Author

Listed:
  • Ilya Somin

Abstract

The Roberts Court saw a number of important advances for judicial enforcement of federalism-based limits on congressional power, both in high-profile cases such as NFIB v. Sebelius, and lesser known ones. Much of this progress fits the conventional model of federalism as a left–right ideological issue on the Court, which divides liberal Democrats from conservative Republicans. But some noteworthy developments depart from this framework, and suggest greater openness to federalism among some on the left.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilya Somin, 2016. "Federalism and the Roberts Court," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 46(3), pages 441-462.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:46:y:2016:i:3:p:441-462.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjw009
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koppelman, Andrew, 2013. "The Tough Luck Constitution and the Assault on Healthcare Reform," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199970025.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:46:y:2016:i:3:p:441-462.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.