IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v46y2016i2p170-198..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governing an International Transboundary River: Opportunism, Safeguards, and Drought Adaptation in the Rio Grande

Author

Listed:
  • Dustin Evan Garrick
  • Edella Schlager
  • Sergio Villamayor-Tomas

Abstract

We extend Bednar’s theory of a robust federation to examine the factors and institutions influencing the effectiveness of transboundary water governance in an international river basin. We examine the evolution and performance of drought adaptation in the Rio Grande/Bravo river basin of the United States and Mexico—two federal countries. Droughts and water shortages since 1990 have triggered opportunistic behavior by resource users and their governments. Analysis of case studies in three nested geographic contexts (internationally, interstate United States and interstate Mexico) generates evidence of opportunistic behavior and either limited or disputed compliance both internationally and within each country. Structural safeguards have stipulated powers and functions for water allocation and conflict resolution in all three settings, but roles and responsibilities are not clear during droughts. The limitations of structural, popular, and judicial safeguards have elevated the importance of joint monitoring, which we identify as a vital new form of safeguard.

Suggested Citation

  • Dustin Evan Garrick & Edella Schlager & Sergio Villamayor-Tomas, 2016. "Governing an International Transboundary River: Opportunism, Safeguards, and Drought Adaptation in the Rio Grande," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 46(2), pages 170-198.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:46:y:2016:i:2:p:170-198.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjw002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:46:y:2016:i:2:p:170-198.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.