IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v40y2010i1p59-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Resilience Meets Critical Junctures: (re)allocation of Power in Three British Parties Post-devolution

Author

Listed:
  • Oivind Bratberg

Abstract

How do parties react when their institutional environment is federalized or devolved? This article investigates how the three dominant British parties have responded to devolution in terms of internal reallocation of power. Party change is evaluated in the light of a functionalist and an institutionalist perspective. We find that Labour has moved incrementally away from centralism; the Conservative Party has changed more extensively towards stratarchy, while the Liberal Democrats, already federalized pre-devolution, have been the least affected of the parties. Our findings lend some support to the institutionalist thesis that (functionally driven) party change is restrained by distinct organizational legacies. However, critical junctures, typically induced by electoral failure, could facilitate a party's break with organizational legacies to embark on more extensive reform. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Oivind Bratberg, 2010. "Institutional Resilience Meets Critical Junctures: (re)allocation of Power in Three British Parties Post-devolution," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 40(1), pages 59-81, Winter.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:40:y:2010:i:1:p:59-81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjp026
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:40:y:2010:i:1:p:59-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.