IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v39y2009i4p677-695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Continuity and Change: A Ranking of Key Issues Affecting U.S. Intergovernmental Relations (1995--2005)

Author

Listed:
  • Carol S. Weissert
  • Carl W. Stenberg
  • Richard L. Cole

Abstract

Few would dispute that federalism and intergovernmental relations in the United States are dynamic and ever-changing. The actions of the U.S. Congress and executive branch, U.S. Supreme Court cases, state innovations, and political, economic, and international events have direct effects on the relationships between and among governments--often advantaging one governmental level with more power, more discretion, or more responsibilities. It is important for scholars to recognize these actions and trends as they develop and test federalism and intergovernmental relations theories in the United States and as they compare these with federalism events and trends in other federal countries. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Carol S. Weissert & Carl W. Stenberg & Richard L. Cole, 2009. "Continuity and Change: A Ranking of Key Issues Affecting U.S. Intergovernmental Relations (1995--2005)," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 39(4), pages 677-695, Fall.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:39:y:2009:i:4:p:677-695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjp007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:39:y:2009:i:4:p:677-695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.