IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v36yi1p135-152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

British Statewide Parties and Multilevel Politics

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Hopkin
  • Jonathan Bradbury

Abstract

The article addresses how Britain's major statewide political parties—Labour, the Conservatives, and the Liberal Democrats—adapted to political devolution in Scotland and Wales. It explores party organization, programs, and policymaking. It argues that the Labour Party experienced the most territorial intraparty conflict but fairly rapidly achieved a new balance between British and Scottish/Welsh party interests. The Conservative Party struggled after its 1997 UK election defeat and failed to adapt to multilevel politics with any consistency. The Liberal Democrats experienced the smoothest adjustment, largely on account of their own federal party constitution. The article concludes that the findings provide some backing to “rational choice institutionalist” hypotheses of party change but that a “historical institutionalist” approach can provide a fuller understanding of how parties adapt to devolution reforms. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Hopkin & Jonathan Bradbury, 0. "British Statewide Parties and Multilevel Politics," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 36(1), pages 135-152.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:36:y::i:1:p:135-152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pjj008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:36:y::i:1:p:135-152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.