IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v35y2005i1p115-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Punishing the Pioneers: The Medicare Modernization Act and State Pharmacy Assistance Programs

Author

Listed:
  • William G. Weissert
  • Edward Alan Miller

Abstract

The adoption of the new Medicare prescription drug benefit in 2003 added yet another iteration to the action-reaction or interactive style of federalism that has characterized this complex policy area for three decades. Though the federal government benefited from state-level policy learning, it penalizes states that were most generous and innovative in their experimentation with pharmaceutical assistance by making them pay for much of the program's costs. The federal government will administer the new benefit, leveling many state-to-state differences in drug coverage, but at the price of standardizing the program under federal rules and punishing pioneering states for their initiative. This precedent may come back to haunt federal-state relationships by discouraging risk taking that might lead to similarly adverse outcomes for innovative states in the future. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • William G. Weissert & Edward Alan Miller, 2005. "Punishing the Pioneers: The Medicare Modernization Act and State Pharmacy Assistance Programs," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 35(1), pages 115-141, Winter.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:35:y:2005:i:1:p:115-141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pji002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:35:y:2005:i:1:p:115-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.