IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v35y2005i1p1-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The State of American Federalism, 2004: Is Federalism Still a Core Value?

Author

Listed:
  • Dale Krane
  • Heidi Koenig

Abstract

Federalism as a political issue was conspicuously absent from the 2004 presidential contest. Unlike many previous campaigns, neither party's candidate made much mention of problems besetting states and localities. The war against global terrorism and the changing situation in Iraq shaped the election. Progress was made on homeland security, but intergovernmental wrangling over federal grants continued unabated. Federal-state feuds were common in several policy areas, including education, environmental protection, and health care. State finances received a revenue boost as economic growth picked up, but rising costs for Medicaid, education, employee pensions, and prisons clouded states' financial forecasts. The U.S. Supreme Court decided several cases with a federalism dimension, and these decisions plus those of the past several years suggest the Court has moved not so much to grant more power to the states but to prune back the power of Congress. Much of what has happened during the first Bush administration must be seen against the larger background of changes in the American political party system. Changes in party organization and policy control, especially during the first Bush administration, reaffirm David Walker's assessment that over the past quarter century American federalism has become more nationalized. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Dale Krane & Heidi Koenig, 2005. "The State of American Federalism, 2004: Is Federalism Still a Core Value?," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 35(1), pages 1-40, Winter.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:35:y:2005:i:1:p:1-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/publius/pji020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Lee & Michael McGuire, 2017. "Intergovernmental Alignment, Program Effectiveness, and U.S. Homelessness Policy," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 47(4), pages 622-647.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:35:y:2005:i:1:p:1-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.