IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v34y2004i3p55-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strengthening the Political Safeguards of Federalism: The Fate of Recent Federalism Legislation in the U.S. Congress

Author

Listed:
  • John Dinan

Abstract

Although a number of measures have been proposed during the past decade to require the U. S. Congress to take more account of state and local interests, whether in regard to mandates, preemptions, regulations, or grants-in-aid, the only major success has been passage of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA). This article examines the fate of the dozen bills that progressed far enough to be the subject of a committee hearing or receive a vote in the House or Senate. Only a few of these measures, most of them rather modest in scope, were enacted, while the most significant measures were rejected, largely because state and local governments have experienced a number of difficulties in reproducing the conditions that were present for the passage of UMRA. Health, labor, and environmental groups were able to block a number of these bills. Business groups occasionally parted company with state and local governments and worked to defeat federalism legislation. Finally, state and local government groups have not always been united in support of these measures. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • John Dinan, 2004. "Strengthening the Political Safeguards of Federalism: The Fate of Recent Federalism Legislation in the U.S. Congress," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 34(3), pages 55-84, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:34:y:2004:i:3:p:55-84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:34:y:2004:i:3:p:55-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.