IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v34y2004i2p1-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Institutional Basis of Secessionist Politics: Federalism and Secession in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence M. Anderson

Abstract

According to the literature on secession, the most important determinant of secessionist sentiment is a high level of grievance experienced by the would-be secessionist group. However, the rationale behind using secession (as opposed to another strategy) as a grievance-amelioration strategy remains almost completely unexplained. This article contends that the institutional setting in which political conflict and grievance are experienced plays a crucial role in whether secession is conceived of as a viable option. This contention is tested by examining the institutional environment of federalism and the role it played in secession in the United States in 1860 and 1861. The United States was uniquely vulnerable to secessionist pressures—as are all federal states, potentially—because of institutional structures that gave constituent states a high level of institutional authority and capacity; this, in turn, contributed to a discourse of states' rights that included the contested right to secede. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence M. Anderson, 2004. "The Institutional Basis of Secessionist Politics: Federalism and Secession in the United States," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 34(2), pages 1-18, Spring.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:34:y:2004:i:2:p:1-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Curtis Bram & Michael Munger, 2022. "Where you stand depends on where you live: county voting on the Texas secession referendum," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 67-79, March.
    2. Martijn Huysmans & Christophe Crombez, 2020. "Making exit costly but efficient: the political economy of exit clauses and secession," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 89-110, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:34:y:2004:i:2:p:1-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.