IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v33y2003i2p17-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making Non-Citizens: Consequences of Administrative Centralization in Tocqueville's Old Regime

Author

Listed:
  • Donald J. Maletz

Abstract

“Individualism” as a deliberate indifference to public life and to the responsibilities of active citizenship was first described in Tocqueville's Democracy in America. That discussion has often been taken to mean that this indifference is an inevitable consequence of modem democracy. Yet the mainly theoretical treatment of the problem in Democracy does not make such a strong claim, and should be read more as a warning of a possible danger than as a statement of a necessary result. The creation of an ethos of individualism as a substitute for citizenship is first fully described in Tocqueville's late work on the prerevolutionary regime in France. There he shows that incapacity for citizenship emerged less from the march toward equality than from the resort to highly centralized administrative methods as an instrument of modernizing reform. Tocqueville's argument in The Old Regime and the Revolution should be regarded as an essential component of his political science and, in particular, as a powerful study of the consequences for democracy of administrative centralization. Copyright 2003, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald J. Maletz, 2003. "Making Non-Citizens: Consequences of Administrative Centralization in Tocqueville's Old Regime," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 33(2), pages 17-35, Spring.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:33:y:2003:i:2:p:17-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:33:y:2003:i:2:p:17-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.