IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v33y2003i1p75-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extinguishing the Twin Relics of Barbaric Multiculturalism—Slavery and Polygamy—From American Federalism

Author

Listed:
  • John Kincaid

Abstract

Nineteenth-century America experienced fierce battles against two expressions of territorially based multiculturalism: southern slavery and Mormon polygamy. Both the southern way of life and the Mormon way of life were deemed barbaric, and considerable pressure was placed on the federal government to exterminate these ways of life. The abolition of slavery required a civil war, the aftermath of which transformed the federal Constitution in ways that enhanced federal authority to intervene in the affairs of the constituent states. The extermination of Mormon polygamy did not require military intervention; instead, the federal government deployed an array of increasingly coercive legalweapons that set precedents for twentieth-century interventions into the affairs of the constituent states. The battles against slavery and polygamy both reflected federal efforts to liberate persons from the tyranny of places and, as such, signaled a rejection of territorially based multiculturalism in the United States. Copyright 2003, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • John Kincaid, 2003. "Extinguishing the Twin Relics of Barbaric Multiculturalism—Slavery and Polygamy—From American Federalism," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 33(1), pages 75-92, Winter.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:33:y:2003:i:1:p:75-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:33:y:2003:i:1:p:75-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.