IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v32y2002i3p47-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Connecting Minorities to the Swiss Federal System: A Frozen Conception of Representation and the Problem of “Requisite Variety”

Author

Listed:
  • Yannis Papadopoulos

Abstract

Heterogeneous Switzerland is often portrayed as a model of successful nation-building. Two major institutions ensure the representation of federal units within the federal political system: the Council of States branch of the bicameral legislature, and the “double majority” of popular and cantonal votes needed in constitutional referenda. It was expected that both mechanisms would counter centrifugal forces possibly created by the self-government of subnational groups. Historical analysis shows, however, that since these institutions were established, some important social transformations have occurred, with perverse effects on minority representation and on cleavage accommodation. The Council of States has come to amplify the influence of established political forces, instead of defending minority influence. The “double majority” now gives excessive veto power to minorities no longer socially relevant, at the expense of newer, more needy groups. National cohesion and consensus democracy, in short, risk being eroded rather than strengthened by these core institutions of the Swiss federal system. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Yannis Papadopoulos, 2002. "Connecting Minorities to the Swiss Federal System: A Frozen Conception of Representation and the Problem of “Requisite Variety”," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 32(3), pages 47-66, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:32:y:2002:i:3:p:47-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:32:y:2002:i:3:p:47-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.