IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v31yi4p65-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Sphere Governance in South Africa: An Interim Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Simeon
  • Christina Murray

Abstract

After considerable debate about whether a democratic South Africa should be constituted on federal lines, the 1996 Constitution adopted three “distinctive, interdependent and interrelated” spheres of government. “Co-operative government” followed the German model, emphasizing concurrency, provincial delivery of national policies, and provincial representation at the center. Implementing this model, with new institutions, actors, and processes, has proved difficult because the governing party strongly favors a relatively centralized polity, and because provinces and local governments have weak political, administrative, and fiscal capacities. The analysis concludes that while the new system has become fairly well established in a short time, its long-term success in promoting the values of democratization, effective governance, and conflict management remains uncertain. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Simeon & Christina Murray, 0. "Multi-Sphere Governance in South Africa: An Interim Assessment," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 31(4), pages 65-92.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:31:y::i:4:p:65-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:31:y::i:4:p:65-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.