IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v31yi4p107-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anglicizing the United States Constitution: James Bryce's Contribution to Australian Federalism

Author

Listed:
  • John S. F. Wright

Abstract

James Bryce's analysis of American federalism made it possible for the Australian founders to reproduce federal institutions on the American model without replicating the republican and empirical ideas that underpinned them in the United States Constitution. Bryce's account in The American Commonwealth (1888) appealed to Australia's founders because it was suited to their needs. Bryce was English, and, like a sensible nineteenth-century Englishman, he argued that U. S. institutions had little to do with intellectual product. Instead, they were largely English institutions adapted to American purposes. Reading Bryce, Australia's founders assumed that if federal institutions had little to do with abstract theory, and had simply been adapted to American circumstances, they might also be adapted to Australian circumstances. Thus, Bryce's approach to American federalism allowed Australia's founders to substitute their own colonial tradition of parliamentary democracy under the Crown for the republican principles of rights and the separation of powers that underlie the U.S. Constitution. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • John S. F. Wright, 0. "Anglicizing the United States Constitution: James Bryce's Contribution to Australian Federalism," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 31(4), pages 107-130.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:31:y::i:4:p:107-130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:31:y::i:4:p:107-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.