IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v31yi3p71-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Federalism in the 2000 Presidential Election

Author

Listed:
  • Troy E. Smith

Abstract

Federalism was not an explicitly prominent feature of the 2000 presidential election, but it exerted significant influence in shaping the political landscape as well as the candidates' positions on the role and purposes of the federal government. America's federal system created powerful undercurrents that influenced the selection of the two major presidential candidates, the campaign issues, and the candidates' messages. At the same time, George W. Bush and Albert Gore differed considerably in their answers to how the United States' federal system should function and the objectives it should seek. Bush favored a federal government that promotes economic opportunity through a marketplace and allows state and local governments to determine their own moral and policy objectives. Gore preferred a national commonwealth, where the federal government determines the moral objectives and the states cooperate to achieve those objectives. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Troy E. Smith, 0. "Federalism in the 2000 Presidential Election," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 31(3), pages 71-95.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:31:y::i:3:p:71-95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:31:y::i:3:p:71-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.