IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v31yi3p1-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The State of U.S. Federalism, 2000-2001: Continuity in Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • John Kincaid

Abstract

Despite the 2000 presidential-election crisis, basic continuity prevailed in American federalism, including survival of the electoral college and furtherance of the more recent shift of federal policymaking from places to persons during today's era of coercive or regulatory federalism. The year revealed the enduring salience of political parties and the prominent role of interest groups in the politics of federalism, as well as the ways in which the federal system shapes, and is shaped by, policy debates. The U.S. Supreme Court continued its state-friendly decision-making while Congress continued to preempt state authority, attach new conditions to federal aid, federalize criminal law, and nationalize power even while giving state and local governments more administrative discretion. The year also illustrated the declining impact of federal aid on state-local revenues compared to the increasing fiscal impact of the federal government's substantive, monetary, and fiscal policies. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • John Kincaid, 0. "The State of U.S. Federalism, 2000-2001: Continuity in Crisis," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 31(3), pages 1-69.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:31:y::i:3:p:1-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:31:y::i:3:p:1-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.