IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v31yi2p1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Federalism: The Lost Tradition?

Author

Listed:
  • Charles S. McCoy

Abstract

In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, many American historians decided that the accounts by which people in the United States understood their past were unrealistic, subject to romantic distortions, and chauvinistic. Even though some stories were well intentioned, they were false and must be rejected. One well-known example is Parson Weems' story of George Washington as a boy cutting down the cherry tree and, when questioned by his father, saying, “I cannot tell a lie.” In the process of “realistic” reinterpretation and muckraking, however, these historians threw out many real babies with the surplus of romantic bath water. A case in point is the tradition of federalism that shaped American history, permeated the experience of the men who wrote the United States Constitution, and underlay every facet of our social order. The so-called “realists” went too far and tossed out an important part of the reality that is America. Can the federal tradition be recovered and placed again at the focus of American political thought, or is it a lost tradition? Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles S. McCoy, 0. "Federalism: The Lost Tradition?," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 31(2), pages 1-14.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:31:y::i:2:p:1-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:31:y::i:2:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.