IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v31yi1p27-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alexis de Tocqueville and the American Character: The Problem of Reconciling Excellence and Consent

Author

Listed:
  • Neal Riemer

Abstract

Although Tocqueville was deeply concerned about the adverse consequences of democratic equality and the tyranny of the majority, he nonethless believed that the character of the American people-reinforced by America's customs, laws, circumstances, constitutional heritage, and favorable geography-would help Americans to achieve a decent, liberal, constitutional polity. Culturally, however, Americans were deficient in reconciling excellence and consent. Less friendly critics have argued that a democracy cannot reconcile excellence and consent. It is, however, possible to move beyond Tocqueville's qualified confidence in American democracy, and his reservations about the ability of Americans to reconcile excellence and consent, by arguing that there is a fundamental concord between excellence and consent, that there is significant popular acceptance and practice of excellence in a democracy, and that creative democratic leadership can advance excellence in a democratic society. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Neal Riemer, 0. "Alexis de Tocqueville and the American Character: The Problem of Reconciling Excellence and Consent," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 31(1), pages 27-36.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:31:y::i:1:p:27-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:31:y::i:1:p:27-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.