IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v31yi1p1-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Daniel J. Elazar and the Covenant Tradition in Politics

Author

Listed:
  • Irving Louis Horowitz

Abstract

This article assesses the ambitious four-volume study by Daniel J. Elazar on The Covenant Tradition in Politics, which was the central occupation of the final decade of his life. The content of the work is an examination from Hebrew antiquity to the American present of the interpenetrating of theological beliefs and political structures. The context of the work is an effort to seek linkages of the American Revolution with both Protestant reformation and scriptural revelation. In this way, Elazar converted the two great national passions of his life and career-the founding of the United States along federalist lines and the re-founding of Israel as a modern Jewish state-into a unified vision of politics. Even if one grants the imperfection and incompleteness of Elazar's synthesis, the monumental character of the enterprise offers us one of the towering achievements of the twentieth century-one that demands the attention and respect of those working in both normative political theory and empirical religious history. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Irving Louis Horowitz, 0. "Daniel J. Elazar and the Covenant Tradition in Politics," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 31(1), pages 1-7.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:31:y::i:1:p:1-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:31:y::i:1:p:1-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.