IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v30yi4p137-153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Constitutional to Treaty Federalism: A Comparative Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas O. Hueglin

Abstract

Federalism in the European Union differs significantly from the American model. First, instead of relying on fixed constitutional rights, the EU remains committed to a treaty-based process of flexible accommodation. Second, the federal system of constitutional power division has been replaced by the subsidiarity principle. The scope and dimension of Community action are tied to negotiated criteria of necessity and efficiency. Third, European federalism has not adopted the American senate model. Member-state participation in the decision-making process is based on the German model of weighted council representation. Regions and civic organizations have gained an additional consultative voice. As a novel type of federal polity, the EU may gain model character for a globalizing world of nation-states whose interests appear loosely interconnected by federal arrangements rather than firmly nested in a federal state. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas O. Hueglin, 0. "From Constitutional to Treaty Federalism: A Comparative Perspective," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 30(4), pages 137-153.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:30:y::i:4:p:137-153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:30:y::i:4:p:137-153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.