IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v29yi2p53-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Federalism and Workforce Policy Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher T. King

Abstract

Workforce development policy encompasses a broad array of federal and state programs designed to foster improved workforce utilization, maintenance, and development. Federalism in U. S. workforce policy is examined in terms of the Workforce Investment Act and the Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Technical Education Act, laws enacted in 1998 authorizing two of the more important components of national workforce policy: job training and work-related education. Coercive federalism in workforce policy began in the late 1970s and is expected to persist into the future, even as states serve as “laboratories of democracy.” Whether enhanced discretion for workforce policy is forthcoming from Washington, states and localities will continue to demonstrate new, and possibly better, ways of delivering workforce services. Workforce policies and programs will also feature an even more prominent role for market-oriented service delivery. The comprehensiveness of national workforce policy, including broad concerns over efficiency, has yet to be addressed fully. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher T. King, 0. "Federalism and Workforce Policy Reform," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 29(2), pages 53-71.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:29:y::i:2:p:53-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edwin Melendez (ed.), 2004. "Comunities and Workforce Development," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number cwfd, December.
    2. Elizabeth Nisbet & Heather A. McKay & Sara Haviland, 2017. "The Emergence of Local Practices in a Devolved Workforce Investment System: Barriers and Possibilities for Enhancing Degree Completion," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 31(3), pages 183-195, August.
    3. Edwin Meléndez & Ramon Borges-Mendez & M. Anne Visser & Anna Rosofsky, 2015. "The Restructured Landscape of Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 29(2), pages 150-166, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:29:y::i:2:p:53-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.