IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v29yi2p135-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Canada: The Supreme Court Sets Rules for the Secession of Quebec

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Leslie

Abstract

The Supreme Court of Canada ruled in 1998 that neither the Canadian constitution nor international law allows Quebec to secede from Canada unilaterally. Secession would require amending the constitution. However, if a clear majority of Quebecers unambiguously opts for secession, the federal government and the other provinces would have a constitutional duty to negotiate. This is an obligation that the court declared to be implicit in four principles that “inform and sustain the constitutional text”—federalism, democracy, constitutionalism and the rule of law, and respect for minorities. The same set of principles would govern the negotiations themselves. Accordingly, Quebec could not dictate the terms of secession, and one cannot assume that agreement would be reached. If negotiations fail, and Quebec declares independence unilaterally, the international community would have to decide whether Quebec's action was legitimate. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Leslie, 0. "Canada: The Supreme Court Sets Rules for the Secession of Quebec," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 29(2), pages 135-151.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:29:y::i:2:p:135-151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:29:y::i:2:p:135-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.