IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v29yi1p71-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asymmetrical Government: Multinational States in an Integrating Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Keating

Abstract

The premodern European state was asymmetrical and differentiated. From the nineteenth century, with the rise of democracy, the penetration of the state into society and later the demand for distributive equity, asymmetry was less acceptable. Nonetheless, asymmetrical elements remained, and territorial intermediation was an important feature of the nation-state. In the late twentieth century, the reemergence of minority nationalism, the restructuring of territorial politics, and the weakening of the nation-state in the face of globalization and European integration have all fostered a new asymmetrical territorial politics. Europe itself is developing asymmetrically and, within states, national minorities are seeking a new place in Europe. The United Kingdom, Spain, and Belgium illustrate these trends. There is no model of the asymmetrical state to replace the old paradigm, but there is a variety of experiences to support it. This process will be manageable as long as Europe does not itself develop state-like features or a nation-building project of its own. Instead, it should, while providing a capacity for common policymaking and a common system of basic rights, remain an ambiguous realm of authority, allowing competing national projects to coexist. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Keating, 0. "Asymmetrical Government: Multinational States in an Integrating Europe," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 29(1), pages 71-86.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:29:y::i:1:p:71-86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:29:y::i:1:p:71-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.