IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v28yi4p1-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Jurisdiction-Based Model of Intergovernmental Management in U.S. Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Agranoff
  • Michael McGuire

Abstract

Variations in levels of intergovernmental activity are explained in terms other than standard “top-down” or “bottom-up” federal management perspectives. Data from 237 cities on intergovernmental management by local managers of economic development policy indicate that differences are determined by the degree to which managers assume a more mutually interactive approach through bargaining, strategic activity, local adjustment, and other internal actions. The jurisdiction-based model is consistent with growing diversity in the federal system and with changing models of public management. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Agranoff & Michael McGuire, 0. "A Jurisdiction-Based Model of Intergovernmental Management in U.S. Cities," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 28(4), pages 1-20.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:28:y::i:4:p:1-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agustín León-Moreta, 2019. "Functional responsibilities of municipal government: Metropolitan disparities and instruments of intergovernmental management," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(12), pages 2585-2607, September.
    2. Nunzio Angiola & Piervito Bianchi, 2017. "Improving performance of long-term care networks at their initial stage: an empirical study of factors affecting results," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 575-594, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:28:y::i:4:p:1-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.