IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v28yi2p1-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alexis de Tocqueville on the Covenantal Tradition of American Federal Democracy

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Allen

Abstract

Perhaps no analyst of democracy's potentials for despotism and self-government understood better than Alexis de Tocqueville the importance of the “favorable circumstances” of America's republican and religious origins. America's covenantal heritage inspired the public philosophy of federal liberty and the federal principle used to establish governments and political associations in colonial New England. The Puritans, Tocqueville explained, created the bonds and the liberties of citizenship by their assent to eternal, transcendent principles, as well as by their consent to government. The principles of covenant ultimately provided the institutional and conceptual foundation of constitutional government, making America's federal democracy less vulnerable to possessive individualism and democratic despotism. Federal principles fostered an important indirect role for religion in American politics. Tocqueville not only analyzed the tension between the requirements of faith and democratic norms, but also distinguished covenantal ways of negotiating these concerns from the approach taken by later advocates of religious freedom, fames Madison and Thomas Jefferson. He argued that federalism's moral foundations will be difficult to preserve if this tension is resolved in ways that promote individual autonomy by undermining covenantal thinking. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Allen, 0. "Alexis de Tocqueville on the Covenantal Tradition of American Federal Democracy," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 28(2), pages 1-23.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:28:y::i:2:p:1-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:28:y::i:2:p:1-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.