IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/publus/v27yi3p97-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fission and Federalism: The Disaggregation of Canadian Party Activists

Author

Listed:
  • David K. Stewart
  • Ian Stewart

Abstract

This article focuses on the Progressive Conservative (PC) party of Canada and contrasts the orientations of four different sets of PC party workers: those who are active in the provincial arena in Nova Scotia and in Alberta, as well as those who are active in the national arena from the same two provinces. The data reveal that federalism has had a disaggregative effect on Canadian political party ideology. Not only is the cleavage between activists in different orders of government consistently large; it also generally exceeds that which exists between activists in different provinces. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • David K. Stewart & Ian Stewart, 0. "Fission and Federalism: The Disaggregation of Canadian Party Activists," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 27(3), pages 97-112.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:27:y::i:3:p:97-112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:publus:v:27:y::i:3:p:97-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/publius .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.