IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v77y2025i2p427-444..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional ‘gaming’ involving staff turnover during recent research evaluation exercises by UK Russell Group universities

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Harris
  • Mariluz Mate-Sanchez-Val
  • Manuel Ruiz Marín

Abstract

There is limited evidence on the extent to which UK universities institutionally ‘game’ the system with respect to periodic research assessment exercises (i.e. RAE/REF), that is, the hiring (and leaving) of staff before the cut-off census date to enhance institutional returns. Population panel data from the Higher Educational Statistical Agency (HESA) for 2004/05–2019/20 are used to consider the extent to which the numbers of ‘starters’, ‘movers’, and ‘exits’ specifically responded to the RAE/REF cycle. Confining the analysis to full professors, a random effects (RE) multinomial logit model was estimated that shows, after taking account of the importance of other covariates, strong evidence of a 2008 and (in particular) 2014 cycle, but no evidence of any upturn in overall hires (or declines in exiting) in the period preceding the 2021 REF census date. Institutional ‘gaming’ therefore seems to have been absent during the most recent REF.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Harris & Mariluz Mate-Sanchez-Val & Manuel Ruiz Marín, 2025. "Institutional ‘gaming’ involving staff turnover during recent research evaluation exercises by UK Russell Group universities," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 77(2), pages 427-444.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:77:y:2025:i:2:p:427-444.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpae032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    research assessment exercises; academic hiring; UK universities;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • J23 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Demand
    • J78 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Public Policy (including comparable worth)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:77:y:2025:i:2:p:427-444.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.