IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v71y2019i1p145-165..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effective skill: a new theoretical perspective on the relation between skills, skill use, mismatches, and wages

Author

Listed:
  • Rolf van der Velden
  • Ineke Bijlsma

Abstract

Skills and skill mismatches affect workers’ productivity. However, current approaches to measuring this problem fail to specify the underlying mechanism. In this paper, we develop a new perspective by integrating skill proficiency and skill use into a new concept called ‘effective skill’. Effective skill is defined as a multiplicative function of skill proficiency and skill use. The intuitive understanding of this concept is that a skill can have no effect on productivity if it is not used and, vice versa, the effect of using skills is moderated by the skill proficiency level. We develop a skill matching model using data from the OECD PIAAC Survey. We show that there is no effect of numeracy on wages, other than through the use of numeracy skills. Moreover, we show that a skill mismatch model based on this concept is superior to alternative skill mismatch models in explaining wage differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Rolf van der Velden & Ineke Bijlsma, 2019. "Effective skill: a new theoretical perspective on the relation between skills, skill use, mismatches, and wages," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 71(1), pages 145-165.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:71:y:2019:i:1:p:145-165.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpy028
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacobs, Babs & van der Velden, Rolf, 2021. "Exploring the uncharted waters of educational mobility: The role of key skills," Research Memorandum 016, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    2. Pérez Rodrigues, Sandra & Huijts, Tim & van der Velden, Rolf & Jacobs, Babs, 2020. "Required literacy and numeracy skill levels for occupations in OECD countries," ROA Technical Report 008, Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA).
    3. Sandra Pérez Rodríguez & Rolf van der Velden & Tim Huijts & Babs Jacobs, 2024. "Identifying literacy and numeracy skill mismatch in OECD countries using the job analysis method," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 76(3), pages 859-876.
    4. Stephan Bischof, 2024. "Test-based measurement of skill mismatch: a validation of five different measurement approaches using the NEPS," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 58(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Maria-Chiara Morandini & Anna Thum-Thysen & Anneleen Vandeplas, 2020. "Facing the Digital Transformation: Are Digital Skills Enough?," European Economy - Economic Briefs 054, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I26 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Returns to Education
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:71:y:2019:i:1:p:145-165.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.