IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v43y1991i1p158-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Robust Are Sign and Rank Order Tests of the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek Theorem?

Author

Listed:
  • Kohler, Wilhelm

Abstract

This paper draws attention to a widely neglected problem of arbitrariness with empirical tests of rank order and sign propositions derived from the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek (HOV) model of the factor content of international trade. The paper concentrates on four different rank order and two different sign propositions of the HOV model, which have all been the subject of empirical analysis in the literature, and it establishes conditions, under which a given data set will support one (rank order or sign) hypothesis while at the same time rejecting another. This will shed some light on the circumstances influencing the likelihood of such non-robust test results. The paper also examines the empirical relevance of this phenomenon of non-robustness using the multi-country data set published in Bowen, Leamer and Sveikauskas (1987). Copyright 1991 by Royal Economic Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Kohler, Wilhelm, 1991. "How Robust Are Sign and Rank Order Tests of the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek Theorem?," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(1), pages 158-171, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:43:y:1991:i:1:p:158-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0030-7653%28199101%292%3A43%3A1%3C158%3AHRASAR%3E2.0.CO%3B2-H&origin=bc
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kiyota, Kozo, 2005. "Services content of Japanese trade," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 261-292, August.
    2. Debeare, Peter, 2003. "Relative Factor Abundance and Trade," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 111(3), pages 589-610, June.
    3. Lundmark, Robert, 2010. "European trade in forest products and fuels," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 235-251, August.
    4. Berislav ZMUK, 2021. "Investigating the impact of GDP and distance variables in the gravity model using sign and rank tests," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 12, pages 5-30, June.
    5. Ahmet M. Çilingirtürk & Habip Koçak, 2018. "Human Development Index (HDI) Rank-Order Variability," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 481-504, June.
    6. Manuel Cabral & Rod Falvey & Chris Milner, 2009. "Does Skill Content Explain Total Trade and Intra‐Industry Trade?," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 71(5), pages 601-619, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:43:y:1991:i:1:p:158-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.