IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/lawfam/v37y2023i1pebac034..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What is ‘good’ domestic violence lawyering?: views from specialist legal services in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Wangmann
  • Francesca Bartlett
  • Becky Batagol
  • Tracey Booth
  • Heather Douglas
  • Miranda Kaye
  • Kate Seear

Abstract

There is increasing recognition that many lawyers, regardless of their practice area, will represent people who have both used and experienced violence in their intimate relationships. This suggests that being informed about domestic and family violence (DFV) is an important attribute of competent lawyering. Despite repeated reports and research drawing attention to poor practices, many lawyers lack DFV training. There is limited research about what it means to be a ‘good’ DFV lawyer. To explore this, we conducted focus groups with lawyers employed in specialist women’s legal services in Australia. Much work undertaken in these services involves working with clients who have experienced DFV, so these lawyers are well placed to identify features of ‘good’ DFV lawyering. The attributes for competent lawyering with people who have experienced DFV, include being knowledgeable about DFV, being trauma-informed/responsive, being knowledgeable about the law and the relevance of violence, adopting a safety lens and providing a holistic service. Our study identifies a number of areas that require further research including understanding the difference between DFV-informed lawyering and trauma-informed/responsive lawyering, and whether specific competencies are required when representing people who experience DFV or have used DFV. Despite years of research and various inquiries pointing to inadequacies and making recommendations for improvement, this article draws attention to continuing gaps in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Wangmann & Francesca Bartlett & Becky Batagol & Tracey Booth & Heather Douglas & Miranda Kaye & Kate Seear, 2023. "What is ‘good’ domestic violence lawyering?: views from specialist legal services in Australia," International Journal of Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(1), pages 1-034..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:lawfam:v:37:y:2023:i:1:p:ebac034.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/lawfam/ebac034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:lawfam:v:37:y:2023:i:1:p:ebac034.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/lawfam .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.