IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/lawfam/v35y2021i1pebab049..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

There’s No Place Like Home: The Role of Informal Carers under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child

Author

Listed:
  • Sheila Varadan

Abstract

Children need guidance and direction to navigate their everyday lives, and such guidance is likely to come from not just parents, but wider family and community. How we acknowledge informal carers and support their caregiving role will have implications for a child’s enjoyment and exercise of rights. Yet, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) does not explicitly recognise ‘kinship’ care nor does it accord formal recognition to informal carers involved in the everyday care of a child. The role of extended family members and community is referenced just once in the CRC, within the framework of parental guidance and direction under article 5. Interrogating the work of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, this paper examines how informal carers have come to be recognised and supported within the CRC. It suggests that while article 5 may offer an avenue to identify informal carers, its scope and function are not open-ended, and the extent to which the CRC provides a legal framework to recognise informal carers and informal care arrangements remains unclear. This paper concludes that more consideration needs to be given to how informal carers are supported and protected within the CRC, to ensure children are not denied their right to family and family relationships under international law.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheila Varadan, 2021. "There’s No Place Like Home: The Role of Informal Carers under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child," International Journal of Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 1-049..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:lawfam:v:35:y:2021:i:1:p:ebab049.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/lawfam/ebab049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:lawfam:v:35:y:2021:i:1:p:ebab049.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/lawfam .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.