IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/lawfam/v35y2021i1pebab039..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bride Price in the Patriarchal South Sudanese Society: A Legal Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Mark A W Deng

Abstract

This article discusses bride price and numerous problems associated with it from a legal perspective. Two such problems, indeed, the most serious of all, are: (i) bride price objectifies and commodifies women, and this lowers women’s status in society; and (ii) bride price violates a woman’s freedom to choose who to marry as all but young girls, that is, those under the age of 18, are forced into marriage by their families for bride-wealth. Young girls who dare to resist can be tortured severely, or even put to death. These practices violate the Transitional Constitution of South Sudan 2011 and the Child Act 2008 under which ‘customs’ and ‘traditions’ that are harmful to women and children are explicitly prohibited. They are equally in conflict with regional and international human rights conventions that proscribe similar practices. In light of all these issues, the article recommends bride price to be abolished through legislative measures—i.e. for the Government of South Sudan to enact a law to criminalise bride price. While this suggestion is likely to be met with resistance, given how deeply culturally ingrained this practice is, what should be compelling for the government is securing women and children’s rights and freedoms.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark A W Deng, 2021. "Bride Price in the Patriarchal South Sudanese Society: A Legal Perspective," International Journal of Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 1-039..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:lawfam:v:35:y:2021:i:1:p:ebab039.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/lawfam/ebab039
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:lawfam:v:35:y:2021:i:1:p:ebab039.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/lawfam .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.