IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/lawfam/v35y2021i1pebab030..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parental Equality in Turkey: Understanding Gender Roles Through the Legal Treatment of Working and Divorced Mothers

Author

Listed:
  • Özgün Çelebi

Abstract

This article addresses the position of Turkish law regarding parental equality, with a focus on day-to-day childcare responsibility. It discusses whether the current legal landscape is consistent with the aim of relieving mothers from a disproportionate share of childcare. The article first explains the general legal framework of gender equality in Turkey before offering closer insight into two fields that help understand whether parental equality is embraced or rejected: measures regarding work–life balance and the organisation of child–parent relationships after divorce. The article analyses specific legal measures impacting the delegation of childcare duties by mothers, including leave and flexible work policies and childcare services. It argues that the legal framework concerning working mothers conveys contradictory messages that reinforce the gendered character of childcare duties. Based on recent case law concerning divorced mothers, the article underlines the potential for the evolution towards parental equality but acknowledges the limited impact of such developments due to the attachment to the maternal preference rule. The article concludes that, despite good intentions and legal reforms favouring gender equality, Turkish law is still devoid of a comprehensive policy regarding parental equality and does not offer incentives for fathers to participate in daily childcare.

Suggested Citation

  • Özgün Çelebi, 2021. "Parental Equality in Turkey: Understanding Gender Roles Through the Legal Treatment of Working and Divorced Mothers," International Journal of Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 1-030..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:lawfam:v:35:y:2021:i:1:p:ebab030.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/lawfam/ebab030
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:lawfam:v:35:y:2021:i:1:p:ebab030.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/lawfam .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.