IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/lawfam/v35y2021i1pebab022..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Misuse or Abuse of Continuing Powers of Attorney: What Are Appropriate Safeguards?

Author

Listed:
  • Rieneke Stelma-Roorda

Abstract

With a continuing power of attorney adults may provide for a future period of incapacity. The misuse or abuse of CPAs is a growing concern in many countries, increasingly the question is asked whether CPAs should not be furnished with more safeguards. Article 12(4) UNCRPD requires states to ensure appropriate and effective safeguards are in place to prevent abuse. This article focuses on the question what appropriate safeguards preventing the misuse and abuse of CPAs are. The article starts with an overview of the research on the risk of misuse and abuse that to date has been conducted. This information is subsequently used to operationalise the three categories of safeguards mentioned in article 12(4) UNCRPD, providing directions as to how appropriate safeguards might look like. Based on these directions, the safeguards implemented in five European countries have been studied with a view to providing insight into how these countries have tried to meet the requirement to ensure appropriate safeguards are in place. It is concluded that more can be done to ensure adults who want to be involved in the running of their affairs are given the opportunity to do so. In addition, attorneys should be made aware of their rights and responsibilities upon entry into force of the CPA and provided with the necessary support.

Suggested Citation

  • Rieneke Stelma-Roorda, 2021. "The Misuse or Abuse of Continuing Powers of Attorney: What Are Appropriate Safeguards?," International Journal of Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 1-022..
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:lawfam:v:35:y:2021:i:1:p:ebab022.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/lawfam/ebab022
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:lawfam:v:35:y:2021:i:1:p:ebab022.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/lawfam .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.