IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jecgeo/v5y2005i3p365-379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Love, money, and gender divisions of labour: some critical reflections on welfare-to-work policies in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Linda McDowell

Abstract

The aim of this contribution to the debates section is to raise some research and policy questions about childcare which has become a key policy issue for the British Government. Childcare currently is a central plank of both the economic efficiency and the social exclusion agenda, as exemplified in welfare-to-work policies which aim to address the under-employment of low income parents as well as the social exclusion of working class children in certain parts of British cities. The uniting focus of this dual aim is the expansion of paid work for women, especially for single mothers and so childcare has become a key economic issue. Behind the introduction of welfare-to-work policies is a belief in the economic rationality of parents, especially mothers, who, it is believed, will use state-provide childcare to facilitate their labour market entry if the price of care is low enough and the standards acceptable. However, this assertion of economic rationality is challenged by research that documents parents' (especially mothers') moral commitments to their care for their dependants personally or through other forms of family-based provision. This commitment may limit the success of current welfare-to-work policies and/or suggest that new policy options may need to be considered, especially if greater social equity is an underlying aim. Suggestions for a new or expanded research agenda are included throughout the paper. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda McDowell, 2005. "Love, money, and gender divisions of labour: some critical reflections on welfare-to-work policies in the UK," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 365-379, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jecgeo:v:5:y:2005:i:3:p:365-379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jnlecg/lbh042
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kang, Ji Young & Huh, Soo Yeon, 2024. "Effect of universal child care subsidy on child-rearing costs by mothers’ working status in South Korea," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Shuo Ding, 2022. "A Comparative Analysis of Vulnerability to Poverty between Urban and Rural Households in China," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-28, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jecgeo:v:5:y:2005:i:3:p:365-379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/joeg .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.