IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v51y2024i3p455-473..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is “4 for $16” Better than “4 for $15.30”? The Price Divisibility Effect in Multipack Purchases

Author

Listed:
  • Hanyong Park
  • JaeHwan Kwon
  • Rajesh Bagchi

Abstract

While much is known about product bundles comprised of different items, much less is known about multipacks—a product set comprised of multiple identical items (e.g., a 4-pack body washes). Using the context of multipacks, the authors propose a novel price divisibility effect, which suggests that a multipack’s price that is easily divisible (vs. non-divisible) by the number of component items in the multipack will increase its purchase likelihood. For example, purchase likelihoods of a four-pack body wash multipack will be higher when its price is $16 (easily divisible by 4) versus $15.30 (non-divisible by 4). This occurs because a divisible versus non-divisible price shifts consumers’ attention to the unit and creates a belief that each unit item in the multipack will be consumed quickly, which, in turn, helps justify purchasing multiple units. The authors report findings from 15 studies (including a field experiment), where they demonstrate the effect and its underlying mechanism and delineate several moderators and boundary conditions. This research contributes to several literature streams, including those on product bundling, multiple-unit pricing, product consumption, and numerical cognition.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanyong Park & JaeHwan Kwon & Rajesh Bagchi, 2024. "Is “4 for $16” Better than “4 for $15.30”? The Price Divisibility Effect in Multipack Purchases," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 51(3), pages 455-473.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:51:y:2024:i:3:p:455-473.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucad071
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:51:y:2024:i:3:p:455-473.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.