IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v51y2024i1p19-28..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

50 Years of Context Effects: Merging the Behavioral and Quantitative Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Ioannis Evangelidis
  • Sudeep Bhatia
  • Jonathan Levav
  • Itamar Simonson

Abstract

Over the past 50 years, consumer researchers have presented extensive evidence that consumer preference can be swayed by the decision context, particularly the configuration of the choice set. Importantly, behavioral research on context effects has inspired prominent quantitative research on multialternative decision-making published in leading psychology, management, economics, and general interest journals. While both streams of research seem to agree that context effects are an important research area, there has been relatively limited interaction, communication, and collaboration between the two research camps. In this article, we seek to initiate an active dialogue between the two sides. We begin by providing a critical overview of the two literatures on context effects, discussing both their strengths and weaknesses, as well as disparities and complementarities. Here, we place particular emphasis on deepening consumer researchers’ understanding of context effects by drawing on prominent quantitative research published in non-marketing journals over the last decades. Importantly, we provide a roadmap for the future that can inspire further research and potential collaborations between the two camps, overcoming silos in knowledge creation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioannis Evangelidis & Sudeep Bhatia & Jonathan Levav & Itamar Simonson, 2024. "50 Years of Context Effects: Merging the Behavioral and Quantitative Perspectives," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 51(1), pages 19-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:51:y:2024:i:1:p:19-28.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucad028
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:51:y:2024:i:1:p:19-28.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.