IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v51y2024i1p180-190..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Much Have We Learned about Consumer Research? A Meta-Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Eisend
  • Gratiana Pol
  • Dominika Niewiadomska
  • Joseph Riley
  • Rick Wedgeworth

Abstract

This meta-meta-analysis study quantifies the development of scientific knowledge in consumer research by summarizing the findings of 222 meta-analyses that together include 2481 meta-analytic effect sizes. The results provide an overview of how much we know and how knowledge has developed in consumer research over time. By explaining 7.8% variance (r = 0.28) in consumer-relevant dependent variables, the findings show that consumer research, a comparatively young discipline, is relatively effective at knowledge development compared to other disciplines. Furthermore, the accumulation of knowledge is significantly increasing, suggesting that our discipline is still in the growing phase of its life cycle and generating continuously improving explanations of consumer-related phenomena. The development of knowledge varies across consumer-relevant dependent variables, with strong explanations for relationships but significantly weaker ones for memory, affect, and attitudes. Moreover, the knowledge synthesized in meta-analyses is fairly—though not fully—representative of the content of primary research on consumers overall. The findings convey a future research agenda by identifying under-researched areas, advising on the selection of dependent variables, providing indicators for the expected contributions of future studies, suggesting implications for career strategies of consumer researchers, and discussing explanations for the observed knowledge growth effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Eisend & Gratiana Pol & Dominika Niewiadomska & Joseph Riley & Rick Wedgeworth, 2024. "How Much Have We Learned about Consumer Research? A Meta-Meta-Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 51(1), pages 180-190.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:51:y:2024:i:1:p:180-190.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucad062
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stacy Wood, 2024. "The Future of Consumer Research Methods: Lessons of a Prospective Retrospective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 51(1), pages 151-156.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:51:y:2024:i:1:p:180-190.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.