IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v50y2023i2p343-362..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No Bandwidth to Self-Gift: How Feeling Constrained Discourages Self-Gifting

Author

Listed:
  • Jacqueline R Rifkin
  • Kelley Gullo Wight
  • Keisha M Cutright
  • Margaret C Campbell
  • Bernd H Schmitt
  • Leonard Lee

Abstract

From time, to money, to energy, many consumers are feeling more constrained than ever before. One potential solution to the pervasive feeling of constraint is self-gifting, which is the process of invoking a hedonic consumption experience with the a priori intention of boosting one’s emotional well-being. But despite being a potentially powerful tool for mood repair, are consumers effectively coping with constraint by engaging in self-gifting? And if not, what is stopping them? A correlational pilot and six studies examine the relationship between the feeling of constraint and self-gifting consumption. When consumers feel constrained, they are less (rather than more) interested in self-gifting, and this is driven by a belief that feeling constrained will hamper their ability to derive the emotional well-being benefits of self-gifting. Importantly, though, this belief is miscalibrated: resource-constrained consumers can derive substantial well-being benefits from self-gifting, relative to those feeling less constrained. The effects generalize across several sources of constraint, do not occur for non-self-gifts, and cannot be explained by feelings of deservingness or justifiability. This research advances understanding of self-gifting, affective forecasting, and consumer decision-making, yields practical recommendations to marketers of self-gifting consumption, and has important consumer implications for people seeking to boost their well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacqueline R Rifkin & Kelley Gullo Wight & Keisha M Cutright & Margaret C Campbell & Bernd H Schmitt & Leonard Lee, 2023. "No Bandwidth to Self-Gift: How Feeling Constrained Discourages Self-Gifting," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 50(2), pages 343-362.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:343-362.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucac053
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:50:y:2023:i:2:p:343-362.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.