IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v48y2021i4p610-632..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Doing Relationship Work: A Theory of Change in Consumer–Brand Relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Claudio Alvarez
  • Danielle J Brick
  • Susan Fournier
  • Linda L Price
  • Hope Jensen Schau

Abstract

This article proposes a novel theory, based on relational paradoxes, to explain how consumers enable or disable their relationships with brands over time. Analysis of data from in-depth, longitudinal interviews with 26 consumers reveals four relational tensions and seven actions that consumers take in response to these tensions, thus affecting the course and character of their brand relationships. Four consumer actions enable the consumer–brand relationship by creating patterns of relationship change based on equilibrium or transformation; three actions disable the relationship via patterns of vicious cycles or conflict. Overall, consumers do relationship work as they act to navigate tensions, thereby creating, maintaining, changing, and terminating their brand relationships. This research has implications for current theory on brand relationship templates, dysfunctional brand relationships, and customer relationship management.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudio Alvarez & Danielle J Brick & Susan Fournier & Linda L Price & Hope Jensen Schau, 2021. "Doing Relationship Work: A Theory of Change in Consumer–Brand Relationships," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(4), pages 610-632.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:48:y:2021:i:4:p:610-632.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucab022
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:48:y:2021:i:4:p:610-632.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.