IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v48y2021i3p394-414..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wordify: A Tool for Discovering and Differentiating Consumer Vocabularies

Author

Listed:
  • Dirk Hovy
  • Shiri Melumad
  • J Jeffrey Inman
  • Richard J Lutz
  • Charles F Hofacker

Abstract

This work describes and illustrates a free and easy-to-use online text-analysis tool for understanding how consumer word use varies across contexts. The tool, Wordify, uses randomized logistic regression (RLR) to identify the words that best discriminate texts drawn from different pre-classified corpora, such as posts written by men versus women, or texts containing mostly negative versus positive valence. We present illustrative examples to show how the tool can be used for such diverse purposes as (1) uncovering the distinctive vocabularies that consumers use when writing reviews on smartphones versus PCs, (2) discovering how the words used in Tweets differ between presumed supporters and opponents of a controversial ad, and (3) expanding the dictionaries of dictionary-based sentiment-measurement tools. We show empirically that Wordify’s RLR algorithm performs better at discriminating vocabularies than support vector machines and chi-square selectors, while offering significant advantages in computing time. A discussion is also provided on the use of Wordify in conjunction with other text-analysis tools, such as probabilistic topic modeling and sentiment analysis, to gain more profound knowledge of the role of language in consumer behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Dirk Hovy & Shiri Melumad & J Jeffrey Inman & Richard J Lutz & Charles F Hofacker, 2021. "Wordify: A Tool for Discovering and Differentiating Consumer Vocabularies," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(3), pages 394-414.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:48:y:2021:i:3:p:394-414.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucab018
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Venkatesh Shankar & Sohil Parsana, 2022. "An overview and empirical comparison of natural language processing (NLP) models and an introduction to and empirical application of autoencoder models in marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 1324-1350, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:48:y:2021:i:3:p:394-414.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.