IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v47y2020i2p192-214..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Product Entitativity: How the Presence of Product Replicates Increases Perceived and Actual Product Efficacy
[Perceptions of the Collective Other]

Author

Listed:
  • Noah Vanbergen
  • Caglar Irmak
  • Julio Sevilla
  • Darren W Dahl
  • J Jeffrey Inman
  • Leonard Lee

Abstract

Many studies document the benefits of presenting smaller quantities of products, particularly when differences in quantity relate to availability or popularity. However, we know less about the effects of quantity differences in contexts unrelated to scarcity, such as when products are depicted in ads, special displays, or online retailing settings. The present research builds on extant literature by investigating a previously unexplored question: How do product perceptions differ depending on whether consumers view a single unit in isolation, versus as one unit among identical product replicates? Five experiments demonstrate that presenting multiple product replicates as a group (vs. presenting a single item) increases product efficacy perceptions because it leads consumers to perceive products as more homogeneous and unified around a shared goal. That is, consumers perceive greater product entitativity when viewing a group of product replicates. As a result, the perceived and actual ability of products to deliver that function (i.e., product efficacy) increases.

Suggested Citation

  • Noah Vanbergen & Caglar Irmak & Julio Sevilla & Darren W Dahl & J Jeffrey Inman & Leonard Lee, 2020. "Product Entitativity: How the Presence of Product Replicates Increases Perceived and Actual Product Efficacy [Perceptions of the Collective Other]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 47(2), pages 192-214.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:47:y:2020:i:2:p:192-214.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucaa006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lexie Lan Huang & Rocky Peng Chen & Kimmy Wa Chan, 2024. "Pairing up with anthropomorphized artificial agents: Leveraging employee creativity in service encounters," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 955-975, July.
    2. Lu Monroe Meng & Tianhui Fu & Shen Duan & Yijie Wang & Yushi Jiang, 2024. "The overlapping effect: impact of product display on price–quality judgments," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 107-128, March.
    3. Smith, Robert W. & Keller, Kevin Lane, 2021. "If all their products seem the same, all the parts within a product seem the same too: How brand homogeneity polarizes product experiences," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 698-714.
    4. Yong-Wan Park & Paul M. Herr & Byung Cho Kim, 2023. "Meaningless procedures can be meaningful for information security: consumer use of single and multiple cues in information security inferences," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 449-461, September.
    5. Yuli Zhang & Hyokjin Kwak & Marina Puzakova & Charles R. Taylor, 2021. "Space between products on display: the impact of interspace on consumer estimation of product size," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 1109-1131, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:47:y:2020:i:2:p:192-214.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.