IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v46y2020i6pi1-i58..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

RETRACTED: Sorry by Size: How the Number of Apologizers Affects Apology Effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Yaxuan Ran
  • Sam J Maglio
  • Yuwei Jiang

Abstract

Company apologies require apologizers, which can take the form of one person or multiple people. Does the number of apologizers influence how consumers interpret and respond to that apology? The current research suggests that a single apologizer proves more effective than multiple apologizers because consumers tend to have a stronger empathic response towards one person than towards multiple people. Across one archival study and four experiments, a single apologizer (relative to multiple apologizers) garners higher stock returns (study 1), elicits a higher rate of behavior indicative of acceptance of the apology (study 2), and more readily facilitates consumer forgiveness of the company, perceived company integrity, and satisfaction with the apology (studies 3-5). This effect is mediated by empathy for the apologizer (studies 4 and 5), and the benefit for a single apologizer dissipates when consumers perceive multiple apologizers as entitative, united members (study 5). Contributions and implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaxuan Ran & Sam J Maglio & Yuwei Jiang, 2020. "RETRACTED: Sorry by Size: How the Number of Apologizers Affects Apology Effectiveness," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(6), pages 1-58.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:46:y:2020:i:6:p:i1-i58.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucz056
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:46:y:2020:i:6:p:i1-i58.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.