IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v46y2019i2p223-245..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unexpected-Framing Effect: Impact of Framing a Product Benefit as Unexpected on Product Desire

Author

Listed:
  • Monica Wadhwa
  • Jeehye Christine Kim
  • Amitava Chattopadhyay
  • Wenbo Wang
  • Vicki G Morwitz
  • Linda L Price
  • Chris Janiszewski

Abstract

Product tests are a common feature before any product launch. During product tests, marketers might discover that the product can deliver additional unintended benefits to the users. Should marketers communicate such unexpectedly found benefits to their potential customers as an unexpectedly discovered benefit or as an intended benefit? Across six experiments, including a field experiment, the current research shows that framing a product benefit as unexpected increases desire for the product, when consumers have a heightened motivation to seek rewards. However, framing an undesirable product feature (e.g., a side effect) as unexpected can negatively impact product desirability for consumers, who have a heightened motivation to avoid losses. Finally, highlighting another managerially important boundary condition, our findings show that the unexpected-framing effect is attenuated when the benefit framed as unexpected is incongruent with the product category. Theoretical and managerial implications of unexpected framing are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica Wadhwa & Jeehye Christine Kim & Amitava Chattopadhyay & Wenbo Wang & Vicki G Morwitz & Linda L Price & Chris Janiszewski, 2019. "Unexpected-Framing Effect: Impact of Framing a Product Benefit as Unexpected on Product Desire," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(2), pages 223-245.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:46:y:2019:i:2:p:223-245.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucz008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:46:y:2019:i:2:p:223-245.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.