IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v16y1990i4p479-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Distance Structures in Consumer Research: Scale versus Order in Validity Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Denison, Daniel R
  • Fornell, Claes

Abstract

Confirmatory multidimensional scaling (CMDS) is presented as a spatial technique for structural modeling based on ordinal assumptions, and as an alternative to metric techniques such as LISREL. The article links both techniques to the multitrait-multimethod matrix and presents a system for deriving measures of symmetric construct relationships, measurement error, and goodness of fit. Examples show that CMDS and LISREL often give comparable results, but that LISREL is sensitive to the magnitude of correlations whereas CMDS is sensitive only to their order. The trade-offs involved in assumptions, results, and interpretations with these methods are highlighted in the conclusion. Copyright 1990 by the University of Chicago.

Suggested Citation

  • Denison, Daniel R & Fornell, Claes, 1990. "Modeling Distance Structures in Consumer Research: Scale versus Order in Validity Assessment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 16(4), pages 479-489, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:16:y:1990:i:4:p:479-89
    DOI: 10.1086/209233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209233
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/209233?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:16:y:1990:i:4:p:479-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.