IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/doi10.1086-672358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Framing the Game: Assessing the Impact of Cultural Representations on Consumer Perceptions of Legitimacy

Author

Listed:
  • Ashlee Humphreys
  • Kathryn A. Latour

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to understand how media frames affect consumer judgments of legitimacy. Because frames exist on the sociocultural and individual level, our research takes a multimethod approach to this question. On the sociocultural level, we conduct a content analysis of operant media frames for discussing online gambling and perform an event analysis, finding that a shift in consumer judgments follows an abrupt shift in frame. Then, on the individual level, the causal mechanism for these shifts is investigated in an experimental setting using the Implicit Association Test (IAT). These experiments show that framing affects normative legitimacy judgments by changing implicit associations. Further, users and nonusers respond differently to frame elements, with users favoring an established frame and nonusers favoring a novel, legitimating frame. This suggests that media frames play a critical role in establishing legitimacy at the sociocultural level and that framing potentially bridges cognitive and normative legitimacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashlee Humphreys & Kathryn A. Latour, 2013. "Framing the Game: Assessing the Impact of Cultural Representations on Consumer Perceptions of Legitimacy," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(4), pages 773-795.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:doi:10.1086/672358
    DOI: 10.1086/672358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/672358
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/672358
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/672358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:doi:10.1086/672358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.